RIGHTS-US: Medics and Interrogations Don’t Mix

• by William Fisher (new york)
• Tuesday, April 07, 2009
• Inter Press Service

A secret leaked 40-page report by the International Committee of the Red Cross concluded that medical professionals working for the C.I.A. were actively involved in the abusive interrogation of terrorist suspects. The report labelled their participation in abusive interrogations that included waterboarding 'a gross breach of medical ethics.'

And, in a virtually unreported ruling last week, Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan found that the Justice Department improperly withheld important psychiatric records of a government witness who was used in a 'significant' number of Guantanamo cases. The judge said it was clear that the witness - a detainee - was being treated weekly for a serious psychological problem and was questioned about whether he had any suicidal thoughts.

The witness provided information in the government's case for continuing to detain Aymen Saeed Batarfi, a Yemeni doctor held at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, since 2001. Judge Sullivan excoriated the government for failing to turn over the witnesses’ medical records and said his testimony in other cases could also be challenged as unreliable. He ordered department lawyers to explain why he shouldn't cite them for contempt of court.

It was widely reported late last month that Batarfi was the second captive to be cleared for release through the new review procedures put in place by U.S. President Barack Obama. The deal struck with government lawyers allows Batarfi to restart his lawsuit if he is not delivered to a country acceptable to him within 30 days. The agreement remains to be reviewed by a judge.

The Red Cross – the only international agency guaranteed access to detainees – concluded in late 2006 that medical professionals working for the C.I.A. monitored prisoners undergoing waterboarding, apparently to make sure they did not drown. Medical workers were also present when guards confined prisoners in small boxes, shackled their arms to the ceiling, kept them in frigid cells and slammed them repeatedly into walls, the report said.

The Red Cross report was based on statements from 14 prisoners who belonged to al Qaeda and were moved to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in late 2006.

Facilitating practices that the Red Cross described as torture was a violation of medical ethics even if the medical workers’ intentions had been to prevent death or permanent injury, the report said. It found that the medical professionals’ role was primarily to support the interrogators, not to protect the prisoners, and that the professionals had 'condoned and participated in ill-treatment.'

'Health professionals violated ethical duties by participating in the torture and abuse of detainees in U.S. custody,' Frank Donaghue, Chief Executive Officer of Physicians for Human Rights (PHR), a non-profit medical advocacy group, told IPS. 'PHR has long demanded a full investigation into the role health professionals played in detainee treatment.'

'It is time for the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, and others to demand a non-partisan commission to investigate these crimes,' Donaghue stressed. 'The associations must sanction any of their membership found to have violated their professional ethics.'

'The Bush Administration weaponised medicine by using health professionals to break the bodies and minds of detainees,' stated John Bradshaw, PHR’s Washington Director. 'Congress must act to restore medical ethics by finally authorising a non-partisan commission to probe these crimes.'

'PHR notes the irony that this long-secret report which lays bare an ethical crisis in the healing professions has surfaced on World Health Day, April 7,' Jonathan Hutson, a PHR spokesman, told IPS.

Dr. Steven H. Miles, a physician at the Centre for Bioethics of the University of Minnesota, said that in recent decades, torture had almost always involved medical professionals, and that to deter future misconduct, the medical role in the C.I.A. program should be fully disclosed.

The American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, and other professional organisations, have condemned participation by their members in detainee interrogations.

The Red Cross report was obtained by Mark Danner, a journalist who has written extensively about torture, and has been published in The New York Review of Books.

At times, according to the detainees’ accounts, medical workers 'gave instructions to interrogators to continue, to adjust or to stop particular methods.' The report does not indicate whether the medical personnel at the C.I.A. sites were physicians, psychologists, physicians’ assistants or former military paramedics.

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-described chief planner of the 9/11 attacks, reportedly told investigators that when he was waterboarded, his pulse and oxygen level were monitored, and that a medical attendant stopped the procedure on several occasions.

Another prisoner, Walid bin Attash, who had previously had a leg amputated, said that when he was forced for days to stand with his arms shackled above his head, a health worker periodically measured the swelling in his intact leg and eventually ordered that he be allowed to sit.

Shortly after taking office in January, President Barack Obama ordered the closing of the Guantanamo Bay prison and the C.I.A. secret detention sites. He directed that the Red Cross be promptly informed of every person detained by the C.I.A. or any other agency.

Regarding the Batarfi case, Jeffrey Kaye, a San Francisco-based psychologist, told IPS that a judge can bar testimony on competency grounds, if there is 'sufficient evidence showing a person's mental incapacity will render his or her testimony irrelevant, misleading, or incredible'; or is problematic due to 'counter-probative mental or psychological conditions or chemical influence.'

In the Batafri case, Kaye added, 'The main issue is the withholding of relevant or probative evidence for the court to assess the credibility of the witness. Whether that witness would be held credible by the court is really a separate issue.'

'It's easy to confirm a witness as competent under these criteria, but not necessarily credible or truthful,' he explained. 'The kinds of conditions that might be relevant to impeaching a witness include: psychoses, most or all neuroses, defects in the structure of the nervous system, mental deficiency, alcoholism, drug addiction, and psychopathic personality or antisocial personality disorder.'

The Red Cross condemned the C.I.A. detention programme not only for using torture and other cruel treatment, but also for holding prisoners without notice to governments or families. The report also details the Bush administration’s lack of cooperation for several years with Red Cross inquiries and investigations. Repeated inquiries and reports from the organisation beginning in 2002 received no response from American officials, the report said.

The new C.I.A. Director, Leon Panetta, has stated that, 'No one who took actions based on legal guidance from the Department of Justice at the time should be investigated, let alone punished.' The C.I.A.’s interrogation methods were declared legal by the Justice Department under President George W. Bush.

© Inter Press Service (2009) — All Rights ReservedOriginal source: Inter Press Service

Where next?

Advertisement