Few Surprises in Obama's Mideast Speech

• by David Elkins (washington)
• Friday, May 20, 2011
• Inter Press Service

However, some analysts here were quick to characterise the speech as a recapitulation of earlier policy positions.

'[W]e have a stake not just in the stability of nations, but in the self-determination of individuals. The status quo is not sustainable. Societies held together by fear and repression may offer the illusion of stability for a time, but they are built upon fault lines that will eventually tear asunder,' Obama stated.

Decades of violent conflict, corruption and diminishing economic opportunities for millions have ingrained the perception — based on both fact and opinion - held by many in the region of the U.S. as being a complicit partner, if not sole instigator, in the perpetuation of such misfortunes: a perception that, since first coming to office, Obama tried to counter assiduously.

Some analysts argue that it was critical for the Obama administration to outline a shift in its regional policy.

'The old way of doing business in the Middle East is no longer sustainable…[T]he Obama administration should redouble its efforts to support the transition by adopting a more comprehensive reform package for Egypt, revive its longstanding but flagging efforts to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict, and stay the course on Iran,' Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, wrote Wednesday.

'Moving more boldly - as President Obama did in his decision on the bin Laden raid - will lead to greater chances for progress and change in the region,' Katulis added.

Dr. Paul Pillar, a former Central Intelligence Agency analyst, argued that the speech failed to deliver an immediate shift in overall policy, but left room for some optimism.

'Most appetites - of those on different sides of the issues concerned - will be left unsatisfied by this speech. That is unsurprising, given the political realities with which the president has to work. But there was enough in the appetizer to raise hope that later - even if only in a possible second term, when Mr. Obama will never have to face re-election again - the president will serve up some real meat,' Pillar wrote in the nationalinterest.com blog on Thursday.

Since the uprisings began, two parallel themes that emerged along with that of the power of organic, peaceful and popular uprisings yearning for dignity, justice and political reform was that of the U.S. response, which received charges of hypocrisy, to the uprisings and Obama's self-described pragmatic 'country-by-country approach and that of the uprisings as presenting an opportunity for a dramatic change in U.S. policy towards the region.

'We have the chance to show that America values the dignity of the street vendor in Tunisia more than the raw power of the dictator,' Obama said.

The speech touched on human rights abuses in countries such as Yemen, where the Obama administration has backed a Gulf Cooperation Council- mediated dialogue with President Ali Abdullah Saleh; and in Bahrain, where the U.S. continues to support a dialogue between Bahraini opposition leaders and their government, which has used violence to suppress protests and arrested doctors providing aid to victims.

'The only way forward is for the government and opposition to engage in a dialogue, and you can't have a real dialogue when parts of the peaceful opposition are in jail.' Obama said, referring to the protests in Bahrain.

President Obama took a tougher tone in acknowledging the intransigence of some the U.S.'s closest allies in the region in suppressing protests, but he did not put forth a clear set of consequences if governments continue such repression.

'[I]f America is to be credible, we must acknowledge that at times our friends in the region have not all reacted to the demands for consistent change -- with change that's consistent with the principles that I've outlined today,' Obama stated.

The central message in his speech was framed as an optimistic plan forward, rather than a retort to the criticism of the contrasts in U.S. policy in the region — full support, even military intervention in Syria and Libya compared to the negligible U.S. backing for political change in Bahrain and Yemen.

As Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu arrives in Washington Friday and the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee gears up for its annual conference this weekend in Washington, Obama did not include any profound changes in policy with regards to the Palestinian- Israeli issue.

He stated that the U.S.'s focus will now be on Israeli security and, most significantly, pre-1967 borders for a Palestinian state rather than the controversial Israeli settlement-building in the West Bank, the division of Jerusalem or the return of Palestinian refugees

Notably, however, he explicitly denounced the United Nations General Assembly vote on officially recognised statehood planned for September while remaining open to the recent Palestinian national reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas, a group the U.S. considers to be a terrorist organisation.

The largest piece missing from the President's speech was mention of Saudi Arabia — a historically strong U.S. ally that has articulated seemingly divergent policies than those of the U.S. in the regional uprisings.

'Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council's policies have changed quite dramatically in the last couple of months,' Gary Sick, former member of National Security Councils under three administrations said on a PRI 'To the Point' interview on Thursday.

'One hand we have enormous people-driven change in part of the Arab world and on the other, we have a really counter-revolutionary movement that is saying 'we want nothing to do with any of this,'' Sick added.

Obama's brief mention of Iran, centred on its past human rights abuses, the Iranian government's role as an enabling ally of Syria and its alleged meddling in sectarian divisions in countries such as Bahrain — a shift from the U.S.'s concentrated focus in the past on Iran's nuclear weapons programme.

Implicit, however, in his emphasis on self-determinism was that fact that the U.S., as has been the case since protests began, will wield little influence over the path that each uprising ultimately takes.

'[W]e must proceed with a sense of humility. It's not America that put people into the streets of Tunis or Cairo - it was the people themselves who launched these movements, and it's the people themselves that must ultimately determine their outcome,' Obama said.

© Inter Press Service (2011) — All Rights ReservedOriginal source: Inter Press Service

Where next?

Advertisement