UN Pension Fund Claims its Assets are Safe, Future Secure

• by Thalif Deen (new york)
• Thursday, July 28, 2016
• Inter Press Service

Responding to criticisms by several staff unions, she said the Fund is processing a higher number of retiree cases every month "than any time in history" and the new processing system is complete and fast clearing the backlog of new retiree claims.

Asked about the $1.4 billion loss in 2015, which was singled out by a US delegate at the UN's Administrative and Budgetary Committee last November, Boykin told IPS the loss was due primarily to sales of securities dominated in non-US dollars and also due to the decline of the US currency against other major currencies.

Following its 63^rd UNJSPF Board meeting in Vienna July 14-22, the 33-member Board re-assured the 126,000 participants and the more than 71,000 retirees and beneficiaries that the Fund "is able to meet its pension and benefit obligations over the long term."

The Board, which will meet again in July 2017, declared "it is confident the Fund is safe and that the Fund's future is secure."

Excerpts from the interview with Boykin:

IPS: How do you respond to charges made by the Coordinating Committee for International Staff Unions and Associations (CCISUA) that the pension fund has plans to privatize and invest some of its assets in Wall Street banks and hedge funds? Are there any such plans? Or were there any such plans in the recent past?

BOYKIN: For procurement activities, and other administrative services, the Fund continues to use the UN "machinery". Those activities are undertaken under UN Financial Regulations and Rules. There is no reference in the draft Rules, nor any authorization, of the Secretary-General or his representative (RSG), who is in charge of the investments, or the CEO to that matter, to "privatize" the Fund or relax any rules or controls.

IPS: While welcoming the Pension Fund's attempt to diversify its investments to ensure solid returns, the US has urged the fund to take more steps to improve its internal investment process and explore alternatives to mitigate foreign exchange losses, which had increased substantially in 2015. Any comments? And how big was this loss?

BOYKIN: In 2015, there was a $1,489,150,849.32 total loss including: (a)  $748,086,861 realized loss; and (b) $741,063,987 unrealized loss. The unrealized loss was due to the strength of the US dollar, and this should be recouped when the US dollar declines against other  major currencies; (c) the realized loss is due to sales of securities denominated in non-USD and (d) in many cases, these securities were sold at a profit, but currency effect was negative.

IPS: The African Group at the UN has called for the diversification of the Pension Fund's investments to developing countries, particularly in Africa. What are its current investments in the developing world? And how big?

BOYKIN: For diversification, the figures are:  Goal:  Comply with the mandate from the General Assembly to increase the geographic diversification of the UNJSPF, particularly in developing countries. And the 2015 results: Investments in developing countries were increased during 2015. The book value (cost) of investments in developing countries increased by US dollars (USD) 336 million: from USD 5.521 billion as of 31 December 2014 to  USD 5.857 billion as of 31 December 2015.

Investments by the Fund in global emerging markets have primarily been in public equity. As of 31 December 2015, the Fund had investments in over 100 countries. This included direct securities investments in 41 countries and 24 currencies, along with indirect investments through international institutions and externally managed funds.

IPS: Speaking on behalf of the Group of 77 developing countries, Karen Lingenfelder of South Africa told the Administrative and Budgetary Committee last November that the Group was concerned about recent media reports of possible fraud and would seek clarity, including an update of recent audit or investigations undertaken in that regard." Considering the high value of the Pension Fund's investment portfolio, the Group urged the Secretary-General to create "a comprehensive anti-fraud policy to better address fraud risk," as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ). This proposal has also been supported by the US. What is the pension fund's reaction to such an anti-fraud policy?

BOYKIN:  Upon request by the ACABQ, the Investment Management Division has drafted an Anti-Fraud policy. The RSG agrees that it is important to have such a policy in order to raise awareness as a preventive measure. Many elements of this policy already exist in other policies. The draft has been reviewed by many oversight parties, and will be adopted prior to General Assembly meetings this fall.

IPS: There are accusations of the botched implementation of a new Enterprise Resource Planning system, called IPAS, which has resulted in a situation where newly retiring staff had to wait an average of six months to receive their first pension payment. What is the current status of delayed pensions to retirees?

BOYKIN: What the fund has said is the following: Regardless of the information that you may hear, the facts, as being presented to the Board, are that the financial health of the Fund is solid, indeed it is expected that the latest actuarial valuation results will show a positive trend. The Fund is processing a higher number of new retiree cases per month than any time in its history. At the same time the Fund is receiving the highest number of cases ever. The basic transition to the new processing system the Integrated Pension Administration System (IPAS) is complete. This new system represents a powerful foundation on which the Fund can build its business processes over the next years.

IPS: In June, the Fund reported it had cleared 97 percent of the backlog, but this claim was disputed by the staff unions, which said only 36 percent of the backlog had been cleared. In July, the fund reported it had cleared 64 percent of the backlog.  But the UN announcement on its intranet didn't endorse the figure of 64 percent but simply said the fund reported this figure. Does it indicate that the UN administration doesn't trust what the pension fund is saying?

BOYKIN: No, the UN has trust in the effective functioning of the fund.

IPS: What are the current total assets of the fund?

BOYKIN: As of July 14, 2016, the Fund had a market value of assets equal to $54.247 billion, and the YTD nominal return was 4.21%. The Fund's long-term return objective (the actuarial assumption) is a 3.5% real rate of return.

IPS: Does the Fund's investments conform to social and environmental guidelines laid down by the UN and the General Assembly?

BOYKIN: The UNJSPF has an Environmental, Social and Governance "(ESG") programme. The Investment Management Division ("IMD") of the UNJSPF has a duty to act in the best interest of our participants and beneficiaries. When evaluating investment opportunities, ESG issues play an important role.

As part of an international organization committed to social progress, better living standards and human rights and as a founding signatory to the UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) initiative and in association with the UN Global Compact (UNGC) and the UN Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), IMD acknowledges its responsibility to society.

Our ESG programme is focused on the following areas: We have restrictions on investments in tobacco and armaments securities, and the green investment portion of our ESG programme includes both green bonds and green equity.

The UNJSPF began the "E" or Environmental part of its ESG program in 2008 when the Fund first invested in green bonds. Green bonds facilitate investments with environmental benefits such as renewable energy, sustainable energy, sustainable waste management, biodiversity conservation and clean transportation.

The UNJSPF is a signatory of several important initiatives - the United Nations supported Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI); A Statement of Investor Expectations for the Green Bond Market; and the 2014/2015 Global Investor Statement on Climate Change.

Subsequent to the UN Climate Summit in September 2014, when the Global Investor Statement on Climate Change was signed by over 400 investors representing more than $24 trillion in assets, our $50 billion pension plan has made significant strides to address climate change.

We worked with MSCI, State Street Global Advisors and BlackRock to develop and launch two low carbon Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), known as LOWC and CRBN. The MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index was announced on 23 September 2014 during the UN Climate Summit. This new index was designed to closely track the performance of the MSCI ACWI Index, while having a lower carbon exposure. We are pleased to see this concept become a reality. Together, we can work on stabilizing greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere and providing long-term growth opportunities for sustainable portfolios.

The writer can be contacted at thalifdeen@aol.com

© Inter Press Service (2016) — All Rights ReservedOriginal source: Inter Press Service

Where next?

Advertisement