RIGHTS: U.N. Asked to Probe CIA Rendition

• by William Fisher (new york)
• Friday, June 26, 2009
• Inter Press Service

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Geneva-based Alkarama for Human Rights have requested that two U.N. Special Rapporteurs investigate the circumstances of Abou Elkassim Britel's forced disappearance, rendition, detention and torture, and raise his case with the governments of the United States, Morocco, Pakistan and Italy.

The requests were made to the U.N. Special Rapporteurs on Torture and the on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights while Countering Terrorism.

'Victims of the 'extraordinary rendition' programme detained at Guantánamo and other prisons around the world are being ignored by the U.S. government, whose unlawful programme landed them there in the first place,' Steven Watt, staff attorney with the ACLU Human Rights Programme, told IPS.

He said, 'The U.S. has failed to take responsibility for its most egregious actions, leaving Mr. Britel and countless other victims of the 'extraordinary rendition' programme with no choice but to turn to the international community for justice.'

Britel, who is also a plaintiff in the ACLU's lawsuit against Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen DataPlan for its role in the rendition programme, is one of the few victims of the programme whose identity is known, and who is still detained outside of Guantánamo Bay.

Britel was initially apprehended and detained in Pakistan by Pakistani authorities on alleged immigration violations in February 2002. After a period of detention and interrogation there, he was handed over to U.S. officials.

The ACLU charges that in May 2002, U.S. officials stripped and beat Britel before dressing him in a diaper and overalls, shackling and blindfolding him and flying him to Morocco for detention and interrogation. Once in Morocco, they say U.S. officials handed him over to Moroccan intelligence officials who detained him incommunicado at the Temara detention centre, where he was interrogated, beaten, deprived of sleep and food and threatened with sexual torture.

Britel was released from custody by Moroccan authorities in February 2003, but was again arrested and detained in May 2003 as he attempted to leave Morocco for his home in Italy. While detained incommunicado in the same detention facility where he had been tortured months earlier, Britel falsely confessed under torture to his involvement in terrorism.

He was later tried and convicted by a Moroccan court on terrorism-related charges and is currently serving a nine-year sentence in a Moroccan prison.

In 2006, an Italian investigating judge dismissed a six-year long investigation into Britel's alleged involvement in terrorism after the judge found a complete lack of evidence linking him with any terrorist-related or criminal activity.

In a related development, the U.N.'s top human rights advocate, Navanethem Pillay, this week called on the Barack Obama administration to release Guantanamo Bay inmates or try them in a court of law.

The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights said that officials who authorised the use of torture must be held accountable for their crimes. She called for a probe into officials who participated in torture sessions or provided its legal justification.

The South African lawyer was also critical of President Obama's decision to hold some suspected terrorists in detention indefinitely without trial.

'People who order or inflict torture cannot be exonerated, and the roles of certain lawyers, as well as doctors who have attended torture sessions, should also be scrutinised,' she said.

While praising the Obama administration for banning many of the harshest interrogation techniques, she said it needed to go further, providing victims of U.S. abuses with an opportunity to rebuild their lives.

'I believe we are finally starting to turn the page on this extremely unfortunate chapter of recent history, with counter-terrorism measures starting to move back in to line with international human rights standards,' Pillay said.

'But there is still much to do before the Guantanamo chapter is truly brought to a close,' she added.

Pillay’s remarks challenged Obama's decision to limit investigation into past abuses and to continue to hold some detainees who have not been charged with a crime. In May, Obama said some detainees deemed too dangerous to release might have to be held indefinitely.

'There should be no half-measures, or new creative ways to treat people as criminals when they have not been found guilty of any crime,' Pillay said. 'Guantanamo showed that torture and unlawful forms of detention can all too easily creep back in to practice during times of stress, and there is still a long way to go before the moral high ground lost since 9/11 can be fully reclaimed.'

But Pillay did not address the Obama administration's decision to use reformed military commissions to try suspected terrorists. Human rights groups have criticised the commissions, particularly that terror suspects could be convicted and executed based on evidence obtained by torture.

Pillay said that detainees who are not prosecuted and potentially face torture if they are sent back to their own countries 'must be given a new home, where they can start to build a new life, in the United States or elsewhere. I welcome the fact that in recent weeks a number of countries have agreed to take in a few people in this position, and urge others to follow suit, including first and foremost the United States itself.'

Earlier this month, the first Guantanamo detainee, Ahmed Ghailani, was flown to the United States to face death penalty charges for his alleged role in the 1998 bombing of two U.S. embassies in East Africa. He is in custody in New York City.

But huge majorities of both Republican and Democratic lawmakers have resisted allowing any more of the remaining 229 detainees at Guantanamo into the United States. Republicans, in particular, have said they do not want Guantanamo detainees 'wandering around in their neighbourhoods'.

As a result, the Senate voted 90 to 6 in May to withhold funding for the closure of Guantanamo until the Obama administration submits a plan for doing so.

Pillay was also highly critical of the administration of George W. Bush. She charged that the Bush administration’s counterterrorism policies had undermined international efforts to end torture.

'The terrorist acts that shook the world on 11 September 2001 had a devastating impact on the fight to eliminate torture,' she wrote. 'Some states that had previously been careful not to practice or condone torture became less scrupulous.'

Pillay called for 'leadership' to end 'this grotesque practice'. She welcomed Obama's decision to close Guantanamo by next January and to ban waterboarding and other extreme interrogation techniques.

'Equally importantly, victims of torture must be helped to recover from one of the worst ordeals that a human being can face. The physical and mental scars of torture are excruciating, the effect on families devastating, and there are often long-term socio-economic effects, including a stigma that can be extremely hard to erase. Victims of torture must be compensated and cared for - for as long as it takes to enable them once again to lead a relatively normal life,' she said.

© Inter Press Service (2009) — All Rights ReservedOriginal source: Inter Press Service